1) The young (at least in spirit) ‘lady’ did indeed receive the utmost in professional help to resolve some very deeply embedded sexual issues. As a professionally trained healer / therapist that would be myself. I will pass your e-mail address onto her so that she can if she wishes appraise you of all the issues she RESOLVED in sexual and relationship areas as part of that professional help.

2) As a ‘professional’ medical research scientist with scientific papers in a diverse range of fields then I too have no truck with pseudo-psychotherapeutic clap trap. As a scientist with multidimensional capabilities I go to extremes to at the very least take a stab at accurately presenting what I find in fields un-explorable and irrationally avoided by science. And your own ’scientific’ and ‘therapeutic’ qualifications to address such issues would be? My scientific experience and papers are here; http://www.clivehetherington.com/scientist-and-academic/ and my therapeutic are here; http://www.clivehetherington.com/healer-therapist-and-wholesoulwork/ although it seems you missed my front page which lists all of the different healing, spiritual and therapy systems, approaches or paths I have ‘researched’ before dismissing / moving on from as well as the list of MY most serious issues that only got RESOLVED by leaving these behind? As a REAL scientist I do rather want to FULLY appraise and investigate different approaches directly else I may be criticized for speaking (or of even writing) about things that I may actually know very little about FROM DIRECT EXPERIENCE . . . . . although it seems that others have no problems doing this!

3) The ‘energies’ you mention in your comment are ‘materially’ based and therefore don’t relate to the descriptions presented here. There is an attempt here; http://www.realitywalker.com/accessing-subtle-energies-explained/ to throw some light on ’subtle energies’. I’ve kept it simple as scientists seem to become quiet, well unscientific in these areas. Science has made certain assumptions about the ‘nature of reality’ and more assumptions about how to go about measuring things. They seem to have forgotten that the ‘map’ never represents the territory and if you have to ignor or as you are doing put down things you don’t understand to retain the integrity of your little map then of course your map never expands and the bigotry continues.

4) ‘Absence of proof is not proof of absence’ seems to hold for such things like ‘dark matter’ where the ‘body of evidence’ at one point only inferred the existence of dark matter, on the other hand as there is a disproportionately greater ‘body of evidence’ relating to ’spirit and the afterlife’ as compared to dark matter for example which strangely is still ignored by science and as such suggests an absence of proof that science is really serious about understanding everything. You will find an extensive and coherent compilation of some of this ‘body of evidence’ here; http://www.victorzammit.com

5) Does the NHS still exist? As someone whom has not needed any of the services of the NHS for at least 9 years then the current workings of the NHS are a mystery to me. On the other hand as their level of integrity and service seem to fall well below my own standards then I am quite happy that it stays this way. For a recent example of both an end product of ’science’ as in ’super bugs’, their NHS ‘management’ (or lack there of) and ‘responsibilities’ taken (or not) with regards ‘modern’ health care standards & ‘patient’ results I refer you to; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/10/13/do1302.xml